Time and Attendance Agent
Time and attendance across the UK, EU, and US where overtime, rest periods, and the CJEU's objective time-tracking duty are validated in seconds - not reconciled by hand each week - under US FLSA, the UK Working Time Regulations, and the EU Working Time Directive.
Time tracking with overtime calculation: US FLSA + 29 CFR Part 778, UK Working Time Regulations 1998 48-hour week, EU Directive 2003/88 + CJEU CCOO objective tracking and GDPR Art. 88.
Analyse your processA selection from over 5,000 projects in 25 years of software development
Overtime, rest periods, and the CJEU's objective time-tracking duty, validated by rule across the US and EU
Time-entry validation is deterministic: the FLSA 40-hour weekly threshold and the regular-rate and exemption rules, state daily-overtime stacking, the UK 48-hour week and rest periods, and the EU Working Time Directive with the CJEU's CCOO and on-call-time rulings. The agent feeds the resulting hours to the Payroll, Sick-Leave, and Leave-of-Absence agents. It applies data minimisation by design - records hold only what the statutes require, monitoring features are off by default, and works-council co-determination is enforced before any biometric or geolocation feature is switched on. This matters most for retroactive cases, which turn on the rules in force at the time of the underlying event.
Outcome: A 2,000-employee organisation logs 4 to 7 million time entries a year. FLSA misclassification opens DOL enforcement with back wages, doubled liquidated damages, and a statute of limitations that extends to three years for wilful violations. California daily-overtime errors carry PAGA penalties per pay period, a UK 48-hour breach can bring civil penalties up to GBP 20,000 per worker, and a GDPR Article 88 violation reaches 4 percent of global turnover. The reality manual processes leave behind: overtime calculations are wrong in 35 to 50 percent of cases, and the works-council consultation for biometric or geolocation features is missing in 50 to 70 percent of implementations.
The agent decomposes time and attendance into 13 rule-based decisions and one mandatory human escalation to manager review - each with a statute citation, an audit trail, and an appeal path.
Time-tracking compliance in seconds, not a weekly manual reconciliation - overtime, the UK 48-hour week, and the CJEU's objective time-tracking duty, all checked by rule
Cross-jurisdictional time and attendance faces four parallel statutory regimes: the US FLSA with its regular-rate, exemption, and hours-worked rules and state daily-overtime laws; the UK Working Time Regulations 1998 with the Employment Rights and National Minimum Wage Acts; the EU Working Time Directive as interpreted by the CJEU; and GDPR. A single time entry can trigger several at once, and the typical 2,000-employee organisation logs 4 to 7 million entries a year - with overtime calculations wrong in 35 to 50 percent of cases when done manually.
Time tracking as an obligation under CJEU CCOO and the Working Time Directive
This agent follows the Decision Layer principle: each decision is rule-based, and the human spot is reserved for manager review and exception approval.
In the CCOO judgment of 14 May 2019, the CJEU held that Member States must require employers to set up an objective, reliable, and accessible system that measures the daily working time of each worker, interpreting the Working Time Directive in light of Article 31(2) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Member State implementation followed: Germany’s Federal Labour Court read an employer time-recording duty into the occupational-safety act, Spain mandated time tracking with four-year retention, and France, Italy, and Poland enforce their own transpositions.
The agent provides objective, reliable, and accessible time tracking through deterministic rules, an audit trail, and Member State routing. It applies data minimisation so records hold only what the statutes require, and it does not enable employer surveillance beyond what working-time law demands.
US FLSA, state daily overtime, and the white-collar exemptions
The FLSA sets a federal minimum wage and overtime at time and one-half over 40 hours a workweek, with the regular-rate rules of 29 CFR Part 778, the white-collar exemptions of Part 541, and a three-year record-keeping requirement.
The regular-rate calculation must fold in all remuneration - non-discretionary bonuses, commissions, shift differentials, and on-call pay. Leaving non-discretionary bonuses out of it underpays overtime systematically.
The Part 541 exemptions (executive, administrative, professional, computer, outside sales) turn on a salary-basis test and a duties test, with the salary threshold raised under the 2024 DOL Final Rule. Misclassification brings back wages, doubled liquidated damages, and a statute of limitations that extends to three years for wilful violations.
State daily overtime runs independently of the FLSA workweek: California, for instance, pays overtime after eight hours in a day and double time after twelve, and adds meal-and-rest-break rules with premium pay for missed breaks. The agent applies the state-by-state stacking and uses whichever calculation pays more. This stacking is missed in 60 to 80 percent of California cases done manually, because a worker can pass the daily eight-hour threshold without passing the weekly 40.
UK Working Time Regulations: the 48-hour week and rest periods
The UK Working Time Regulations 1998 implement the EU Directive with a 48-hour weekly limit averaged over a 17-week reference period, an 11-hour daily and 24-hour weekly rest, a 20-minute break for shifts over six hours, and 5.6 weeks of annual leave, alongside the individual opt-out and night-worker limits.
Case law shapes the holiday-pay calculation - Bear Scotland held that holiday pay must reflect normal remuneration including overtime, with Williams, Lock, and Harpur Trust building on it. The National Minimum Wage Act adds six-year record-keeping and HMRC enforcement, with a 200 percent underpayment penalty.
The agent calculates the 17-week reference period, tracks the opt-out, monitors the daily and weekly rest, the break, and the annual-leave entitlement, flags breaches, and applies the ACAS and ICO codes.
GDPR Article 88 and works-council codetermination
Time-tracking data is personal data under GDPR; a fingerprint or facial-recognition clock-in is special-category biometric data under Article 9, and geolocation and RFID are location data. Processing rests on legal obligation (the working-time statutes) and contract performance, under the Article 88 employment rules, with data minimisation by design, a mandatory DPIA for systematic monitoring, and the Article 22 bar on fully automated decisions.
Member State law adds co-determination: in Germany, the Works Constitution Act requires works-council agreement for any system that monitors employee behaviour - biometric clock-in, facial recognition, GPS, or RFID - with equivalent consultation duties in France, Italy, Spain, and Poland.
The CJEU’s Matzak ruling held that on-call time at home with an eight-minute response constraint is working time, and Stadt Offenbach added that stand-by counts only when the constraints significantly affect the worker’s ability to manage free time. The EDPB employment-data guidelines clarify the lawful-basis hierarchy and the DPIA criteria.
The agent runs the works-council codetermination workflow before any biometric or geolocation feature is switched on, keeps monitoring features off by default, requires a DPIA before deployment, and enforces data minimisation by design rather than through access controls alone.
Cross-reference to Payroll-Processing, Sick-Leave-Processing, and Leave-of-Absence
The Time and Attendance Agent supplies the regular rate, overtime hours, and premium pay to the Payroll Processing Agent, tracks scheduled versus actual hours for the Sick Leave Processing and Leave of Absence agents, uses the HR Document Management Agent for retention and audit trail, and works with the Audit Compliance Agent on FLSA misclassification, state premium-pay claims, and works-council disputes.
Payroll consumes the regular-rate and overtime output. Sick Leave reconciles scheduled against actual hours. Leave of Absence uses scheduled hours for accrual. Audit Compliance draws on the FLSA, UK 48-hour, and CJEU CCOO compliance evidence the agent records.
The agent handles the volume, the deterministic calculation, and the statutory thresholds; the human keeps exception approval and works-council consultation. Tracking every threshold reliably is what keeps compliance from slipping in a manual reconciliation.
At a glance
- 13 rule-based decisions and one mandatory human escalation to manager review and exception approval
- US FLSA, with the regular-rate, white-collar-exemption, and hours-worked rules
- US state daily overtime (California and others) and state meal-and-rest-break rules
- UK Working Time Regulations 1998: the 48-hour week, daily and weekly rest, the 20-minute break, 5.6 weeks of leave, and the opt-out
- EU Working Time Directive with the CJEU CCOO, Matzak, and Stadt Offenbach rulings on objective tracking and on-call time
- GDPR Articles 6, 88, 22, and 35, with Member State works-council codetermination for biometric or geolocation monitoring
- SOC 1 and SOC 2, ISO 27001, and ISO 30414 productivity metrics
Decision-Maker Distribution Time-Attendance
| Decision Type | Count | Example | Challengeable |
|---|---|---|---|
| R Rule-based | 13 | Channel classification, entry validation, FLSA and state overtime, exempt-status check, UK 48-hour week, EU Working Time Directive and CJEU on-call time, anomaly detection, schedule match, regular rate of pay, meal and rest breaks, statutory notifications, payroll update, audit trail | not applicable |
| A AI-augmented | 0 | none - deterministic rules | not applicable |
| H Human escalation | 1 | Manager review, exception approval, works-council consultation | not applicable |
Micro-Decision Table
Who decides in this agent?
14 decision steps, split by decider
Receive a time entry and route it by channel and jurisdiction Is each time entry classified by source (self-service portal, manager entry, biometric clock, RFID badge, mobile geolocation, or a time terminal), routed to its jurisdiction (US FLSA and state daily overtime, the UK Working Time Regulations, or the EU Working Time Directive and Member State law), and tagged by entry type (regular, overtime, on-call, travel, meal break, or rest break)? Rules Engine
Channel detection and jurisdiction routing are rule-based, sending each entry to the right regime - US FLSA, the UK Working Time Regulations, or the EU Working Time Directive - so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Validate the entry for completeness and CCOO accessibility Is each entry checked for completeness (employee ID, start and end time, break duration, work location, cost centre, project code), verified as objective, reliable, and accessible per the CJEU CCOO ruling, and held to data minimisation under GDPR Article 5(1)(c), with incomplete entries flagged? Rules Engine
Time entries are validated by rule against the statutory requirements and the CJEU's CCOO standard that the record be objective, reliable, and accessible, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Calculate FLSA and state overtime, applying whichever pays more Is weekly overtime calculated under the FLSA over-40-hour rule (time and one-half) and the state daily-overtime rules where they apply - California's eight-hours-a-day, double-time-after-twelve, and seventh-consecutive-day rules among them - then stacked per jurisdiction so the calculation that produces the higher pay governs? Rules Engine
Overtime is a deterministic statutory calculation - the FLSA 40-hour weekly threshold and state daily-overtime rules such as California's - and the agent applies whichever formula produces the higher pay, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Check FLSA exempt status against the salary and duties tests Is FLSA exempt status checked against the 29 CFR Part 541 categories (executive, administrative, professional, computer, outside sales), the salary-basis threshold under the 2024 DOL Final Rule, and the duties test - flagging misclassification risk and routing ambiguous cases to HR, the Compliance Officer, and employment counsel? Rules Engine
FLSA exempt status is checked by rule against the 29 CFR Part 541 salary-basis and duties tests, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R); ambiguous cases route to HR and the Compliance Officer for a human misclassification call.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Apply the UK Working Time Regulations limits and rest periods Are the UK Working Time Regulations 1998 applied - the 48-hour weekly limit averaged over the 17-week reference period, the 11-hour daily and 24-hour weekly rest, the 20-minute break for shifts over six hours, 5.6 weeks of annual leave, the Regulation 4(2) individual opt-out, and the night-worker eight-hour average - with breaches flagged? Rules Engine
The UK 48-hour weekly limit (averaged over the 17-week reference period), the 11-hour daily rest, and the opt-out are calculated deterministically under the Working Time Regulations 1998, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Apply the EU Working Time Directive and on-call case law Is the EU Working Time Directive applied - the 48-hour week averaged over the four-month reference period, annual leave, and the night-work and reference-period rules - with on-call and stand-by time classified per the CJEU Matzak and Stadt Offenbach rulings and the relevant Member State transposition (such as the German Arbeitszeitgesetz or the French 35-hour week)? Rules Engine
The EU 48-hour week and the on-call-time classification from the CJEU Matzak and Stadt Offenbach rulings are calculated deterministically under the Working Time Directive, with Member State transpositions applied, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Detect anomalies and apply collective-bargaining premiums Are anomalies detected in time entries - missing clock-outs, extended or back-to-back shifts, insufficient rest, meal-break violations, and holiday, Sunday, or night work - then run against the shift rules and collective-bargaining premium tables, with breaches flagged under the UK, Member State, and works-council rules? Rules Engine
Anomaly detection runs by rule against statutory thresholds, collective-bargaining premium tables, and shift rules, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R); flagged breaches route to manager review for a human assessment of any legitimate business reason.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Match entries to the schedule, contract, and work location Are time entries linked to the scheduled shift, contract terms, cost centre, project code, and work location, with discrepancies between scheduled and actual hours flagged and a remote-work or telework jurisdiction analysis applied? Rules Engine
Time entries are matched deterministically to the scheduled shift, contract terms, cost centre, and work location, with remote-work jurisdiction analysis, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Calculate the FLSA regular rate of pay for the overtime base Is the FLSA regular rate of pay calculated under 29 CFR Part 778 - including all remuneration such as non-discretionary bonuses, commissions, shift differentials, and on-call pay, with the fluctuating-workweek method where it applies - and passed to the Payroll-Processing-Agent as the base for time-and-one-half and state double-time? Rules Engine
The FLSA regular rate of pay is calculated deterministically under 29 CFR Part 778, including non-discretionary bonuses, commissions, and shift differentials, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Validate meal and rest breaks and the premium pay for missed breaks Are meal and rest breaks validated against the state rules - California's 30-minute meal and 10-minute-per-four-hours rest under Labor Code Section 512 and Brinker, with one hour's premium pay for a missed break - and the UK 20-minute break for shifts over six hours, counting short rest periods as hours worked under 29 CFR 785.18? Rules Engine
Meal and rest breaks are validated deterministically - California's 30-minute meal and 10-minute rest rules with premium pay for missed breaks, and the UK 20-minute break - so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Send statutory notifications and keep records on schedule Are statutory notifications sent within their deadlines and working-time records kept on the required schedule - the FLSA three-year retention under 29 CFR Part 516, the UK two-year requirement, and the longer Member State periods - with works-council notification where co-determination applies? Rules Engine
Statutory notifications and record-keeping run by rule on tracked deadlines - the FLSA three-year retention, the UK two-year record requirement, and works-council notification where required - so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Sync validated hours and pay to payroll, benefits, and accruals Are the validated hours, regular rate, overtime, and premium pay (on-call, meal-break, and holiday, Sunday, and night premiums) recorded and synced to payroll with accrual updates, flagging any benefits-eligibility impact such as the ACA hours threshold, ERISA participation, or a state Paid Family Leave wage base? Rules Engine
Validated hours, the regular rate, overtime, and premium pay sync downstream deterministically, flagging benefits-eligibility impacts such as the ACA hours threshold, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Manager reviews and signs off flagged exceptions Does a designated approver (Line Manager, HR Director, Payroll Lead, Compliance Officer, or DPO) review the flagged exceptions - overtime approvals, meal-break violations, missed clock-outs, schedule deviations, and any FLSA misclassification risk, state premium-pay claim, or works-council reservation? Human
Flagged exceptions - overtime approvals, missed clock-outs, break violations, schedule deviations - need a manager's sign-off for accountability and business judgement, with works-council consultation where it applies. The decision on a legitimate business reason and corrective action stays human (Decision-Type H).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - via manager, works council, or formal objection process.
Write the audit trail and apply the retention schedule Are decision records logged with reasoning, timestamps, signatures, access events, classification, and jurisdiction, and retained on the applicable schedule - three years for US FLSA, two for the UK Working Time Regulations, the longer Member State periods, and the EU AI Act Article 12 system-log lifetime plus ten years? Rules Engine
The audit trail is written by rule, logging each time entry with reasoning, timestamps, signatures, and access events to satisfy GDPR accountability (Articles 30, 5(2), 32) and the EU AI Act record-keeping duty (Article 12). Retention follows the FLSA three-year and UK two-year requirements, so the logic is rule-based (Decision-Type R).
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Decision Record and Right to Challenge
Every decision this agent makes or prepares is documented in a complete decision record. Affected employees can review, understand, and challenge every individual decision.
Does this agent fit your process?
We analyse your specific HR process and show how this agent fits into your system landscape. 30 minutes, no preparation needed.
Analyse your processGovernance Notes
Assessment
Prerequisites
- Time entry intake capability supporting electronic submission (employee self-service portal + manager portal + biometric clock-in clock-out + RFID badge + mobile geolocation + integrated email or chat tool + ATOSS terminal + Kronos clock + UKG terminal + Workday Time Tracking + ADP Time and Attendance) capable of US workweek + state daily overtime + UK 48-hour week + EU Working Time Directive + Member State implementation
- Employee schedule + contract terms + cost center + project code + work location accessible to the agent with statutory window tracking (US FLSA workweek + state daily overtime reference period + UK Working Time Regulations 17-week reference period + EU Working Time Directive 4-month reference period + Member State equivalent) + collective bargaining agreement integration
- Statutory entitlement calculation engine codified per jurisdiction (FLSA 29 USC 207 over 40 hours per workweek + 29 CFR Part 778 regular rate of pay + state daily overtime California Labor Code Section 510 + Alaska AS 23.10.060 + Nevada NRS 608.018 + Colorado COMPS Order + state meal and rest breaks + UK Working Time Regulations 1998 SI 1998/1833 Regulation 4 48-hour week + EU Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC Article 6 + Member State implementation Germany Arbeitszeitgesetz + France Code du Travail 35-hour week + Italy + Spain + Poland)
- Statutory notification + record-keeping interfaces (US DOL Wage and Hour record-keeping 29 CFR Part 516 + state Labor Commissioner records + UK Working Time Regulations Regulation 9 + 2 years record retention + EU Member State implementation Germany ArbZG Section 16 + 2 years + Spain Real Decreto-ley 8/2019 + 4 years + Poland Kodeks Pracy + works council codetermination notification per Betriebsverfassungsgesetz Section 87(1) Number 6)
- Integration with payroll + benefits + accruals + scheduling systems (Workday + ADP Workforce Now + SAP SuccessFactors + Oracle Cloud HCM + Ceridian Dayforce + UKG Pro + ATOSS + Tisoware + Kronos + Replicon + TSheets + Microsoft Teams + Microsoft Shifts + BambooHR + Personio + Trinet + Insperity + Justworks + Rippling + Sage UK + IRIS UK + ServiceNow HR Service Delivery)
- Data Processing Agreement covering time tracking data per EU GDPR Article 6(1)(b) contract performance + Article 6(1)(c) legal obligation + Article 88 employee data + Article 5(1)(c) data minimisation + Article 22 prohibition fully automated decision-making + Article 35 DPIA Data Protection Impact Assessment for systematic monitoring including biometric and geolocation + works council codetermination per EU Member State + Germany Betriebsverfassungsgesetz Section 87(1) Number 6 technical monitoring
- Collective bargaining agreement integration + works council codetermination workflow + premium calculation tables + shift rules + Sunday holiday night premiums + on-call pay rules + travel time rules + meal and rest break premium pay + CJEU C-518/15 Matzak on-call time analysis + CJEU C-580/19 Stadt Offenbach stand-by analysis + CJEU C-55/18 CCOO objective verifiable accessible system implementation
- EU AI Act 2024/1689 Article 4 AI Literacy + Article 13 Transparency + Article 14 Human Oversight + Article 26 Deployer Obligations + Article 50 Transparency for AI-generated content conformity + Article 99 fines + AICPA SOC 1 Type II + SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001:2022 InfoSec + ISO 30414:2018 Human Capital Reporting + EU GDPR Article 88 + UK GDPR + DPA 2018 + ICO Employment Practices Code + NIST SP 800-53
Infrastructure Contribution
What this assessment contains: 9 slides for your leadership team
Personalised with your numbers. Generated in 2 minutes directly in your browser. No upload, no login.
- 1
Title slide - Process name, decision points, automation potential
- 2
Executive summary - FTE freed, cost per transaction before/after, break-even date, cost of waiting
- 3
Current state - Transaction volume, error costs, growth scenario with FTE comparison
- 4
Solution architecture - Human - rules engine - AI agent with specific decision points
- 5
Governance - EU AI Act, works council, audit trail - with traffic light status
- 6
Risk analysis - 5 risks with likelihood, impact and mitigation
- 7
Roadmap - 3-phase plan with concrete calendar dates and Go/No-Go
- 8
Business case - 3-scenario comparison (do nothing/hire/automate) plus 3×3 sensitivity matrix
- 9
Discussion proposal - Concrete next steps with timeline and responsibilities
Includes: 3-scenario comparison
Do nothing vs. new hire vs. automation - with your salary level, your error rate and your growth plan. The one slide your CFO wants to see first.
Show calculation methodology
Hourly rate: Annual salary (your input) × 1.3 employer burden ÷ 1,720 annual work hours
Savings: Transactions × 12 × automation rate × minutes/transaction × hourly rate × economic factor
Quality ROI: Error reduction × transactions × 12 × EUR 260/error (APQC Open Standards Benchmarking)
FTE: Saved hours ÷ 1,720 annual work hours
Break-Even: Benchmark investment ÷ monthly combined savings (efficiency + quality)
New hire: Annual salary × 1.3 + EUR 12,000 recruiting per FTE
All data stays in your browser. Nothing is transmitted to any server.
Time and Attendance Agent
Initial assessment for your leadership team
A thorough initial assessment in 2 minutes - with your numbers, your risk profile and industry benchmarks. No vendor logo, no sales pitch.
All data stays in your browser. Nothing is transmitted.
Related Pages
Agent Blueprint Available
A full blueprint for Time and Attendance Agent is available with micro-decision decomposition, industry variants, and implementation details.
View BlueprintRelated Agents
Employee Data Management Agent
Holds employee master data in one place, governed to EU GDPR, UK GDPR, California's CCPA/CPRA and the growing wave of US state privacy laws at once - with erasure, access requests and breach notification handled the same way across every system.
Employee Self-Service Agent
An employee self-service portal that answers questions instead of handing over forms - handling subject access requests, leave, sickness and payslips under GDPR, CCPA and the ADA, accessible to WCAG 2.1 AA, with the chatbot openly identifying itself as AI.
HR Document Management Agent
An electronic personnel file where every document carries its own retention clock and access trail - GDPR access and erasure requests answered on time, US tax and discrimination records kept as long as the law demands, across the UK, EU and US.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the CJEU's CCOO objective-time-tracking duty apply to AI-augmented time and attendance, and what is the legal basis?
How do the FLSA, the regular-rate rules, and state daily overtime interact, and how does the agent handle stacking?
How do the UK Working Time Regulations work, and how does the agent track the individual opt-out?
How do GDPR Article 88, the DPIA duty, works-council co-determination, and the Matzak on-call ruling apply to biometric or geolocation time tracking?
How does the agent handle FLSA white-collar exemption analysis - the duties test and the 2024 DOL salary thresholds?
How does the Time and Attendance Agent differ from the Payroll Processing Agent and Sick Leave Processing Agent and Leave of Absence Agent?
Can the agent be deployed over legacy paper timesheets, spreadsheets, and three-week monthly reconciliation, as mid-market and Fortune 500 organisations typically run?
What Happens Next?
30 minutes
Initial call
We analyse your process and identify the optimal starting point.
1 week
Discover
Mapping your decision logic. Rule sets documented, Decision Layer designed.
3-4 weeks
Build
Production agent in your infrastructure. Governance, audit trail, cert-ready from day 1.
12-18 months
Self-sufficient
Full access to source code, prompts and rule versions. No vendor lock-in.
Implement This Agent?
We assess your process landscape and show how this agent fits into your infrastructure.