Training Effectiveness Agent - Kirkpatrick, Phillips ROI, CSRD S1-13 | Gosign
ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 Skills Reporting + Kirkpatrick 4-Levels + Phillips ROI 5-Levels + UK Apprenticeship Levy + US WIOA + ESCO + ISCED + ISO 30414 Skills + EU GDPR Article 88 + works council training codetermination in one Decision Layer - deterministic measurement aggregation plus AI-supported transfer indicators for L and D Director, CHRO, CFO, ESG Officer, Apprenticeship Manager, Skills Strategy Lead.
Training measurement: Kirkpatrick 4-Levels + Phillips ROI 5-Levels, US WIOA + DOL Apprenticeship, UK Apprenticeship Levy and ESCO/ISCED - CSRD ESRS S1-13 skills reporting and ISO 30414.
Analyse your processAuswahl aus über 5.000 Projekten in 25 Jahren Softwareentwicklung
Kirkpatrick 4-Levels + Phillips ROI 5-Levels + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 Skills Reporting + UK Apprenticeship Levy + US WIOA + DOL Office of Apprenticeship + EU GDPR Article 88 + works council training codetermination in one Decision Layer
High R-share deterministic measurement aggregation with Kirkpatrick Level 1 Reaction satisfaction surveys + Level 2 Learning pre-post knowledge tests + Level 3 Behavior 90-day on-the-job application + Level 4 Results business KPIs + Phillips ROI Level 5 monetary benefit cost ratio + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 training-and-skills-development data + ISO 30414 skills metric + ISO 9001 7.2 competence records + UK Apprenticeship Levy reporting + US WIOA Joint Performance Indicators - effectiveness aggregation runs rule-based from LMS data plus survey responses plus business KPI feeds plus skills framework mappings without generative AI in measurement; AI-supported only for transfer indicators plus skill gap detection plus content recommendations; human validation for L and D Director plus business sponsor plus apprenticeship reviews.
Outcome: ESG/CSRD limited-assurance qualifications by Big-4 auditors on missing training-and-skills-development disclosures + UK ESFA audit findings on Apprenticeship Levy expenditure plus 24 month fund expiry without proper utilisation + US WIOA performance accountability failures plus federal funding consequences + EEOC disparate impact claims on training selection without statistical validation + UK Ofqual qualification regulation breaches + EU GDPR fines up to 4 percent group revenue on missing Article 88 lawful basis for training data plus works council blockade on aggregate measurement implementation - the agent provides the AICPA SOC 2 Type II auditable chain.
The architecture reflects that training effectiveness measurement must be deterministic for measurement aggregation plus AI-supported only for transfer indicators, never for individual learner consequences:
From assumed training value to measured business impact - 78 percent of effectiveness measurement deterministic, ML-based transfer indicators only - ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 mandatory training-and-skills-development from 250 employees + UK Apprenticeship Levy 0.5 percent payroll over 3M GBP + US WIOA performance accountability + DOL Office of Apprenticeship 29 CFR 29 + EEOC disparate impact
Training effectiveness measurement Kirkpatrick + Phillips ROI
This agent follows the Decision Layer principle: each decision is either rule-based, AI-assisted, or explicitly assigned to a human. It is NOT classified per EU AI Act 2024/1689 as a high-risk system (measurement-aggregation without individual learning consequences), but is subject to strict compliance obligations from US WIOA + DOL Office of Apprenticeship + EEOC + UK Apprenticeship Levy 2017 + UK ESFA + UK Ofqual + EU European Skills Framework ESCO + UNESCO ISCED + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 + ISO 30414 + ISO 9001 + AICPA SOC 2 Type II + EU GDPR Article 88.
Training effectiveness measurement decomposes into Kirkpatrick 4-Levels: Level 1 Reaction (post-training satisfaction + Net Promoter Score + content relevance + facilitator effectiveness), Level 2 Learning (pre-post knowledge tests + skill assessments + competency demonstrations + certification pass rates), Level 3 Behavior (90-day on-the-job application + manager observations + peer feedback + behavior change frequency), Level 4 Results (business KPIs + revenue + cost reduction + quality + safety + retention). Phillips ROI extends with Level 5 monetary benefit cost ratio + isolation-of-effects methodology (control group + trend line + forecasting + estimation + management contribution + customer input + expert estimation).
The challenge is not the measurement framework. It is in the AICPA SOC 2 Type II auditable chain + xAPI Learning Record Store LRS + SCORM 1.2/2004 + ESG/CSRD limited-assurance scope + four-eye principle L and D Director + business sponsor + CHRO + ESG Officer + audit-trail with User + timestamp + before/after values + measurement run ID + data lineage + works council co-determination on aggregate measurement.
US WIOA + UK Apprenticeship Levy + ESFA + Ofqual
US Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act WIOA Public Law 113-128 mandates 6 Joint Performance Indicators per Title I Adult Dislocated Worker Youth + Title II Adult Education and Family Literacy + Title III Wagner-Peyser Employment Service + Title IV Vocational Rehabilitation: employment Q2 post-exit, employment Q4 post-exit, median earnings Q2 post-exit, credential attainment, measurable skill gains, effectiveness in serving employers. State Workforce Investment Boards + American Job Centers + DOL ETA aggregate reports.
US DOL Office of Apprenticeship Registered Apprenticeship per 29 CFR 29 + 29 CFR 30 Equal Employment Opportunity in Apprenticeship submits data to RAPIDS Registered Apprenticeship Partners Information Database System. Industry Recognized Apprenticeship Programs IRAP + State Apprenticeship Agencies SAA + 26 USC 51 Work Opportunity Tax Credit complement the framework.
UK Apprenticeship Levy 2017 + Finance Act 2016 Sections 99-100 mandates 0.5 percent annual pay bill over 3M GBP collected through HMRC PAYE + Apprenticeship Service Account ASA with 24 month fund expiry + 10 percent government top-up. UK ESFA Education and Skills Funding Agency Apprenticeship Funding Rules + Standards Funding Bands + Funding Audit oversight. UK Ofqual Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation governs End-Point Assessment EPA Organisations register + Apprenticeship Standards quality assurance. Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education IfATE manages standards.
EEOC training requirements per Title VII Civil Rights Act 1964 + ADA Americans with Disabilities Act + ADEA Age Discrimination in Employment Act + Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures 29 CFR 1607 with 4/5ths rule disparate impact analysis on training selection prevent discrimination claims.
ESCO + ISCED + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 Skills Reporting
EU ESCO European Skills Competences Qualifications and Occupations classification covers 14000 occupations + 13000 skills/competences + 10000 qualifications. Cross-Reference EU EQF European Qualifications Framework + Bologna Process + Cedefop European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. UNESCO ISCED 2011 International Standard Classification of Education provides 9 levels (Early Childhood through Doctoral) + ISCED-A Education Attainment + ISCED-F Fields of Education and Training. UNESCO Institute for Statistics UIS + EU Eurostat education statistics + OECD Education at a Glance complement.
EU CSRD 2022/2464 ESRS S1-13 Skills Reporting requires training-and-skills-development data: average training hours per employee + percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews + diversity dimensions training participation. EFRAG ESRS Datapoints Excel maps each KPI to source data with full lineage. Auditor verification limited assurance from 250 employees by Big-4 firms (Deloitte + EY + KPMG + PwC) per IAASB ISAE 3000 + ISAE 3402.
ISO 30414 Human Capital Reporting metrics include category 4.6 training-and-skills-development + 4.7 leadership + 4.4 organisational culture + 4.5 productivity. ISO 9001 7.2 Competence + 7.3 Awareness + 7.5 Documented Information training records ensure quality management. ISO 21001 educational organisations + ISO 29993 learning services outside formal education complement.
EU GDPR Article 88 + works council training codetermination
EU GDPR Article 88 Member State law on processing in the context of employment + Article 6 lawful basis for processing + Article 9 special categories of personal data + Article 22 automated individual decision-making govern training data processing. The agent uses pseudonymisation per Article 4(5) at extraction + aggregation thresholds (minimum 5 employees per cohort) prevent re-identification.
Works council co-determination per EU Information and Consultation Directive 2002/14/EC + national co-determination acts mandatory for aggregate measurement implementation in EU operations. Works council blockade prevents go-live - mandatory consultation + agreement before deployment. Cross-Reference EDPB Guidelines 1/2024 on HR AI systems + ICO UK guidance + national supervisory authorities BfDI + CNIL + ICO + AEPD + Garante.
DPIA per Article 35 mandatory before deployment + Cross-Reference EU AI Act Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment FRIA where ML transfer indicators trigger classification.
Cross-reference to Skills-Career-Profile + Performance-Review-Documentation + Learning-Path-Recommendation
Skills-Career-Profile-Agent feeds individual skills assessments into aggregate Training Effectiveness for skill gap analysis. Performance-Review-Documentation-Agent uses Training Effectiveness Level 3 Behavior 90-day post-training observations as evidence in performance reviews. Learning-Path-Recommendation-Agent uses skill gap detection + content recommendations from Training Effectiveness for individual learning paths. Strategic-HR-Analytics-Agent integrates training effectiveness measurements into Board Reporting + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13. Workforce-Planning-Agent uses skills framework mappings from Training Effectiveness for headcount planning + scenario modelling. Succession-Planning-Agent uses leadership development effectiveness for board-level talent reviews. Compensation-Benchmarking-Agent integrates skills certification effects into compensation bands. ESG-Reporting-Agent extends ESRS S1-13 training-and-skills-development data to full sustainability reporting. Audit-Compliance-Agent verifies AICPA SOC 2 Type II + EU AI Act Article 26 (when AI features expand).
At a glance
- Classification: Compliance-Support, NOT EU AI Act high-risk (measurement-aggregation)
- Compliance anchors: US WIOA Title I-IV + DOL Office of Apprenticeship 29 CFR 29 + 29 CFR 30 + EEOC Title VII + ADA + ADEA disparate impact + UK Apprenticeship Levy 2017 + UK ESFA + UK Ofqual + EU ESCO + UNESCO ISCED + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 + ISO 30414 + ISO 9001 + AICPA SOC 2 Type II + EU GDPR Article 6+88
- Measurement framework: Kirkpatrick 4-Levels Reaction Learning Behavior Results + Phillips ROI 5-Levels including Level 5 monetary benefit cost ratio with isolation-of-effects methodology
- Approval: Four-eye principle L and D Director + business sponsor + CHRO + ESG Officer + works council consultation + Audit Committee oversight + commentary + interpretation human-only
- Penalties: ESG/CSRD limited-assurance qualifications + UK ESFA audit findings + 24 month fund expiry + US WIOA performance failures + EEOC disparate impact claims + UK Ofqual breaches + EU GDPR up to 4 percent group revenue + works council blockade
- Audit obligation: AICPA SOC 2 Type II + ESG/CSRD limited assurance from 250 employees + UK ESFA Funding Audit annually + US WIOA performance accountability per State Workforce Investment Boards + DOL Office of Apprenticeship RAPIDS submission + EEOC disparate impact verification
- Cross-Reference: Skills-Career-Profile + Performance-Review-Documentation + Learning-Path-Recommendation + Strategic-HR-Analytics + Workforce-Planning + Succession-Planning + Compensation-Benchmarking + ESG-Reporting + Audit-Compliance
Decision-Maker Distribution Training-Effectiveness
| Step | Decider | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| LMS data extraction + xAPI/SCORM + pseudonymisation | R | ETL extraction with deterministic source-to-target mapping + EU GDPR Article 4(5) |
| Kirkpatrick Level 1 Reaction satisfaction aggregation | R | Survey response computation deterministic |
| Kirkpatrick Level 2 Learning pre-post tests | R | Score deltas + statistical significance deterministic |
| Kirkpatrick Level 3 Behavior 90-day on-the-job | R | Manager + peer feedback aggregation deterministic |
| Kirkpatrick Level 4 + Phillips ROI Level 5 monetary | R | Isolation-of-effects + monetary benefit deterministic |
| Knowledge transfer + skill gap + content recommendation | A | ML transfer indicators with human validation |
| ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 training-and-skills-development | R | EFRAG datapoints deterministic |
| ISO 30414 skills + leadership + culture metrics | R | 11 reporting categories deterministic |
| US WIOA Joint Performance Indicators Title I-IV | R | 6 indicators per Title deterministic |
| DOL Office of Apprenticeship 29 CFR 29 + RAPIDS | R | Apprentice progression + EEO compliance deterministic |
| UK Apprenticeship Levy + Service Account + 24 month | R | Levy expenditure + Funding Rules deterministic |
| ESCO + ISCED qualification level mapping | R | Skills classification + qualification alignment deterministic |
| EEOC disparate impact + Uniform Guidelines 4/5ths | R | Statistical significance + protected characteristics deterministic |
| L and D Director + business sponsor approval | H | Four-eye AICPA SOC 2 + interpretation mandatory |
Micro-Decision Table
Who decides in this agent?
14 decision steps, split by decider
Training data extraction plus LMS integration plus learner participation plus completion records Are learning data + LMS records + xAPI/SCORM completion + assessment scores + survey responses + enrolment data extracted from source systems (Cornerstone + SAP SuccessFactors Learning + Workday Learning + Oracle Cloud HCM Learning + Ceridian Dayforce + UKG + Personio Learning + Eloomi + Degreed + EdCast + LinkedIn Learning + Microsoft Viva Learning + Coursera + Udemy + Pluralsight + Skillsoft + Docebo + TalentLMS + Moodle + Saba) with pseudonymisation per EU GDPR Article 4(5) + reconciliation + audit-trail (User + timestamp + before/after values + data lineage)? Rules Engine
Rule-based ETL extraction with deterministic source-to-target mapping per system + xAPI Learning Record Store LRS + SCORM 1.2/2004 statements + reconciliation rules + pseudonymisation per EU GDPR Article 4(5) + Cross-Reference AICPA SOC 2 Type II Trust Services Criteria + ISO 27001 access controls; deterministic extraction logic hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Kirkpatrick Level 1 Reaction satisfaction survey aggregation Are Kirkpatrick Level 1 Reaction post-training satisfaction survey responses + Net Promoter Score + content relevance ratings + facilitator effectiveness + course design ratings deterministically aggregated per cohort + course + business unit + period + Cross-Reference ISO 9001 7.2 Competence training records + ISO 30414 training-and-skills-development metric? Rules Engine
Rule-based Kirkpatrick Level 1 aggregation with deterministic survey response computation + cohort/course/business unit dimensions + Cross-Reference ISO 9001 7.2 Competence + ISO 30414 4.6 training-and-skills-development + ESRS S1-13 datapoints; deterministic aggregation logic hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Kirkpatrick Level 2 Learning pre-post knowledge test calculation Are Kirkpatrick Level 2 Learning pre-post knowledge test scores + skill assessments + competency demonstrations + certification pass rates deterministically calculated per cohort with statistical significance testing + Cross-Reference ISO 30414 skills metric + ESCO competency framework + UK Apprenticeship Standards EPA End-Point Assessment? Rules Engine
Rule-based Kirkpatrick Level 2 calculation + pre-post score deltas + statistical significance + competency demonstration + Cross-Reference ISO 30414 skills + ESCO + UK Ofqual EPA + UNESCO ISCED qualification levels; deterministic learning measurement hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Kirkpatrick Level 3 Behavior 90-day on-the-job application tracking Are Kirkpatrick Level 3 Behavior 90-day post-training on-the-job application + manager observations + peer feedback + self-assessment + behavior change frequency deterministically aggregated per cohort + business unit + role family + Cross-Reference ESCO competency frameworks + UK Apprenticeship Standards behaviors + ISO 30414 productivity metric? Rules Engine
Rule-based Kirkpatrick Level 3 aggregation + 90-day post-training observation period + manager and peer feedback aggregation + Cross-Reference ESCO behaviors + UK Apprenticeship Standards behaviors + ISO 30414 productivity; deterministic behavior aggregation hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Kirkpatrick Level 4 Results plus Phillips ROI Level 5 business impact monetary calculation Are Kirkpatrick Level 4 Results business KPIs + Phillips ROI Level 5 monetary benefit cost ratio (revenue + cost reduction + quality improvement + safety incident reduction + customer satisfaction + retention) deterministically calculated per cohort + business unit + period + program with isolation-of-effects methodology + Cross-Reference ESRS S1-13 training-and-skills-development data + ISO 30414 productivity metric? Rules Engine
Rule-based Kirkpatrick Level 4 + Phillips ROI Level 5 calculation + isolation-of-effects (control group + trend line + forecasting + estimation + management contribution + customer input + expert estimation) + monetary benefit calculation + Cross-Reference ESRS S1-13 + ISO 30414 productivity; deterministic ROI calculation hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Knowledge transfer measurement plus skill gap detection plus content recommendation Are knowledge transfer indicators + skill gap detection + ML-based content recommendations + adaptive learning paths + competency progression generated as ML-supported indicators with confidence scores for L and D Director Dashboards from LMS data + LinkedIn Learning Skills Graph + Coursera Skills + Pluralsight Skill IQ + Degreed Skills + Microsoft Viva Skills? AI Agent Auditor
ML-supported transfer indicators + skill gap detection + content recommendations with company-specific learning data; LLM output indicator not final decision; human validation L and D Director + business sponsor on transfer interpretation; NO automated learning consequences for individuals; Cross-Reference EU AI Act Annex III(4) employment management + EDPB Guidelines 1/2024 on HR AI systems + AICPA SOC 2 Type II audit sampling
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - fully documented, reviewable by humans, objection via formal process.
Challengeable by: Auditor
ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 Skills Reporting training-and-skills-development data calculation Are ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 Skills Reporting training-and-skills-development data + average training hours per employee + percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews + diversity dimensions training participation deterministically calculated for auditor verification limited assurance from 250 employees? Rules Engine
Rule-based ESRS S1-13 training-and-skills-development datapoint calculation + auditor verification limited assurance + Cross-Reference EFRAG ESRS Datapoints + ISSB IFRS S1 General + applicable from 250 employees CSRD 2022/2464; deterministic ESG/CSRD reporting hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
ISO 30414 Human Capital Reporting plus skills metric plus 11 categories calculation Are ISO 30414 Human Capital Reporting skills metric category 4.6 training-and-skills-development + leadership 4.7 + organisational culture 4.4 + productivity 4.5 + workforce composition 4.2 + costs 4.3 deterministically calculated for stakeholder transparency reporting + Cross-Reference ISO 9001 7.2 Competence + 7.3 Awareness + 7.5 Documented Information? Rules Engine
Rule-based ISO 30414 calculation + 11 reporting categories with focus on training-and-skills-development + leadership + Cross-Reference ISO 9001 7.2 + 7.3 + 7.5 + ISO 21001 educational organisations + ISO 29993 learning services + auditor verification; deterministic ISO 30414 calculation hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
US WIOA Joint Performance Indicators plus Title I-IV reporting calculation Are US Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act WIOA Joint Performance Indicators (employment Q2 post-exit + employment Q4 post-exit + median earnings Q2 post-exit + credential attainment + measurable skill gains + effectiveness in serving employers) + Title I Adult Dislocated Worker Youth + Title II Adult Education + Title III Wagner-Peyser + Title IV Vocational Rehabilitation deterministically calculated for State Workforce Investment Boards + American Job Centers + DOL ETA? Rules Engine
Rule-based WIOA Joint Performance Indicators calculation + 6 indicators per Title + State Workforce Investment Boards + American Job Centers + DOL ETA reporting + Cross-Reference WIOA Public Law 113-128 + State Workforce Investment Boards + Local Workforce Development Boards; deterministic WIOA reporting hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
US DOL Office of Apprenticeship Registered Apprenticeship 29 CFR 29 reporting Are US DOL Office of Apprenticeship Registered Apprenticeship 29 CFR 29 + 29 CFR 30 EEO in Apprenticeship reporting + RAPIDS Registered Apprenticeship Partners Information Database System + apprentice progression + completion rates + wage progression + EEO compliance deterministically generated for State Apprenticeship Agencies + DOL ETA? Rules Engine
Rule-based DOL Office of Apprenticeship reporting + 29 CFR 29 standards + 29 CFR 30 EEO + RAPIDS data submission + apprentice progression + Cross-Reference State Apprenticeship Agencies SAA + DOL ETA + Industry Recognized Apprenticeship Programs IRAP + 26 USC 51 Work Opportunity Tax Credit; deterministic Apprenticeship reporting hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
UK Apprenticeship Levy 2017 reporting plus Apprenticeship Service Account utilisation Are UK Apprenticeship Levy 2017 reporting + 0.5 percent annual pay bill over 3M GBP + Apprenticeship Service Account utilisation + 24 month fund expiry tracking + 10 percent government top-up + Apprenticeship Funding Rules compliance + Apprenticeship Standards mapping + End-Point Assessment EPA outcomes deterministically generated for HMRC + ESFA? Rules Engine
Rule-based UK Apprenticeship Levy reporting + 0.5 percent payroll calculation + Apprenticeship Service Account drawdown + 24 month expiry alerts + 10 percent top-up tracking + Cross-Reference HMRC PAYE collection + UK ESFA Apprenticeship Funding Rules + UK Ofqual EPA + Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education; deterministic Levy reporting hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
ESCO European Skills Framework plus ISCED qualification level mapping Are ESCO European Skills Competences Qualifications and Occupations classification mapping + 14000 occupations + 13000 skills/competences + 10000 qualifications + UNESCO ISCED International Standard Classification of Education 9 levels Early Childhood through Doctoral + ISCED-A Education Attainment + ISCED-F Fields of Education and Training deterministically applied to learning catalog + skills profiles + qualification frameworks? Rules Engine
Rule-based ESCO + ISCED mapping engine + skills classification + qualification level alignment + Cross-Reference EU EQF European Qualifications Framework + Bologna Process + Cedefop + UNESCO Institute for Statistics UIS; deterministic skills framework mapping hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
EEOC disparate impact analysis plus Uniform Guidelines 4/5ths rule training selection Is EEOC disparate impact analysis on training selection + Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures 29 CFR 1607 + 4/5ths rule + statistical significance testing + protected characteristics participation rates + Cross-Reference Title VII + ADA + ADEA + GINA + Pregnant Workers Fairness Act deterministically calculated for compliance verification? Rules Engine
Rule-based EEOC disparate impact analysis + Uniform Guidelines 29 CFR 1607 + 4/5ths rule statistical test + protected characteristics participation comparison + Cross-Reference EEOC Compliance Manual + State FEPA + Title VII selection procedures; deterministic disparate impact calculation hence Decision-Type R
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
L and D Director plus business sponsor approval plus four-eye review Is the training effectiveness reporting approved by L and D Director + business sponsor + CHRO + ESG Officer in four-eye principle with commentary + interpretation + plausibility confirmation + works council consultation + EU GDPR Article 88 lawful basis + AICPA SOC 2 Type II audit-trail + ESG/CSRD limited-assurance auditor sign-off? Human
Human approval by L and D Director + business sponsor + CHRO + ESG Officer mandatory for AICPA SOC 2-compliant audit-trail + works council consultation per EU Information and Consultation Directive 2002/14/EC + EU GDPR Article 88 lawful basis + ESG/CSRD limited-assurance auditor sign-off + interpretation + commentary stays with humans; human decision mandatory
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - via manager, works council, or formal objection process.
Decision Record and Right to Challenge
Every decision this agent makes or prepares is documented in a complete decision record. Affected employees can review, understand, and challenge every individual decision.
Does this agent fit your process?
We analyse your specific HR process and show how this agent fits into your system landscape. 30 minutes, no preparation needed.
Analyse your processGovernance Notes
Assessment
Prerequisites
- LMS data export with structured ETL + xAPI Learning Record Store LRS + SCORM 1.2/2004 + reconciliation + pseudonymisation per EU GDPR Article 4(5)
- Kirkpatrick 4-Levels measurement framework + Level 1 Reaction surveys + Level 2 Learning assessments + Level 3 Behavior observations + Level 4 Results business KPIs
- Phillips ROI 5-Levels measurement framework + Level 5 monetary benefit cost ratio + isolation-of-effects methodology
- ESCO European Skills Competences Qualifications and Occupations mapping + UNESCO ISCED qualification levels + EU EQF alignment
- ISO 30414 training-and-skills-development metric + ISO 9001 7.2 Competence + 7.3 Awareness + 7.5 Documented Information records
- ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 Skills Reporting training-and-skills-development datapoint + EFRAG datapoint Excel + auditor limited-assurance scope
- US WIOA Joint Performance Indicators + Title I-IV reporting + State Workforce Investment Boards + American Job Centers integration
- US DOL Office of Apprenticeship Registered Apprenticeship 29 CFR 29 + 29 CFR 30 EEO + RAPIDS submission + State Apprenticeship Agencies
- UK Apprenticeship Levy reporting engine + Apprenticeship Service Account + 24 month expiry tracking + 10 percent top-up + Apprenticeship Funding Rules
- UK Ofqual End-Point Assessment Organisations register + Apprenticeship Standards + Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education
- EU GDPR Article 6 lawful basis + Article 88 employment + works council training co-determination + DPIA per Article 35
- AICPA SOC 2 Type II audit framework + ISAE 3000 + ISAE 3402 + Big-4 limited assurance ESG capability
Infrastructure Contribution
What this assessment contains: 9 slides for your leadership team
Personalised with your numbers. Generated in 2 minutes directly in your browser. No upload, no login.
- 1
Title slide - Process name, decision points, automation potential
- 2
Executive summary - FTE freed, cost per transaction before/after, break-even date, cost of waiting
- 3
Current state - Transaction volume, error costs, growth scenario with FTE comparison
- 4
Solution architecture - Human - rules engine - AI agent with specific decision points
- 5
Governance - EU AI Act, works council, audit trail - with traffic light status
- 6
Risk analysis - 5 risks with likelihood, impact and mitigation
- 7
Roadmap - 3-phase plan with concrete calendar dates and Go/No-Go
- 8
Business case - 3-scenario comparison (do nothing/hire/automate) plus 3×3 sensitivity matrix
- 9
Discussion proposal - Concrete next steps with timeline and responsibilities
Includes: 3-scenario comparison
Do nothing vs. new hire vs. automation - with your salary level, your error rate and your growth plan. The one slide your CFO wants to see first.
Show calculation methodology
Hourly rate: Annual salary (your input) × 1.3 employer burden ÷ 1,720 annual work hours
Savings: Transactions × 12 × automation rate × minutes/transaction × hourly rate × economic factor
Quality ROI: Error reduction × transactions × 12 × EUR 260/error (APQC Open Standards Benchmarking)
FTE: Saved hours ÷ 1,720 annual work hours
Break-Even: Benchmark investment ÷ monthly combined savings (efficiency + quality)
New hire: Annual salary × 1.3 + EUR 12,000 recruiting per FTE
All data stays in your browser. Nothing is transmitted to any server.
Training Effectiveness Agent - Kirkpatrick, Phillips ROI, CSRD S1-13 | Gosign
Initial assessment for your leadership team
A thorough initial assessment in 2 minutes - with your numbers, your risk profile and industry benchmarks. No vendor logo, no sales pitch.
All data stays in your browser. Nothing is transmitted.
Related Pages
Agent Blueprint Available
A full blueprint for Training Effectiveness Agent - Kirkpatrick, Phillips ROI, CSRD S1-13 | Gosign is available with micro-decision decomposition, industry variants, and implementation details.
View BlueprintRelated Agents
Certification Tracking Agent - OSHA 29 CFR 1910, UK HSWA, ISO 45001 | Gosign
From US OSHA 29 CFR 1910 plus AML BSA training plus HIPAA 45 CFR 164.530 plus FAA DOT FMCSA through UK HSWA 1974 plus CQC GMC NMC to EU Framework Directive 89/391 plus 6AMLD plus GDPR Article 39 DPO plus ISO 45001 - one auditable certification-tracking pipeline across mandatory-training plus expiring-certificates plus renewal orchestration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the agent make autonomous learning decisions about individual employees?
No. The agent generates deterministic Kirkpatrick 4-Levels + Phillips ROI 5-Levels + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13 + ISO 30414 + UK Apprenticeship Levy + US WIOA Joint Performance Indicators measurements from finished LMS data + survey responses + business KPI feeds + skills framework mappings. ML-based transfer indicators + skill gap detection + content recommendations provide indicators only - never automated learning consequences for individuals. Four-eye principle L and D Director + business sponsor + CHRO + ESG Officer mandatory for AICPA SOC 2-compliant audit-trail. Commentary + interpretation stays with humans. The agent ensures the process runs consistently + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13-conforme + ISO 30414-conforme + ISO 9001-conforme + UK Apprenticeship Levy-conforme + US WIOA-conforme + DOL Office of Apprenticeship-conforme + AICPA SOC 2 Type II auditable + EU GDPR Article 88-conforme.
Why is this agent NOT an EU AI Act high-risk system?
Training effectiveness measurement is measurement-aggregation (LMS data extraction + Kirkpatrick aggregation + Phillips ROI calculation + skills framework mapping + ML-supported transfer indicators) without AI-based individual learning consequences for evaluating individual employees. EU AI Act Annex III(4)(a) and III(4)(b) target recruitment bias and individual compensation/promotion decisions - here nothing about individual learning consequences is decided, only deterministically aggregated and indicators provided. With integrated ML transfer indicators + skill gap detection + content recommendations, DPIA per EU GDPR Article 35 should still be performed + Cross-Reference EDPB Guidelines 1/2024 on HR AI systems + EU GDPR Article 22 right not to be subject to automated decision-making, but no high-risk classification. The high compliance requirements come from ESG/CSRD limited assurance + UK Apprenticeship Levy + US WIOA + DOL Office of Apprenticeship + EEOC disparate impact + ISO 30414 + AICPA SOC 2, not from EU AI Act. Note: if adaptive learning features expand to individual scoring with HR consequences (promotion + compensation + termination), classification may shift to high-risk under Annex III(4).
How is UK Apprenticeship Levy reporting plus 24 month fund expiry handled?
UK Apprenticeship Levy 2017 + Finance Act 2016 Sections 99-100 mandates 0.5 percent annual pay bill over 3M GBP collected by HMRC through PAYE. The agent tracks Apprenticeship Service Account drawdown + 24 month fund expiry alerts + 10 percent government top-up + Apprenticeship Funding Rules compliance + Apprenticeship Standards mapping + Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education IfATE + UK Ofqual End-Point Assessment EPA Organisations + Cross-Reference UK Department for Education DfE + UK ESFA Education and Skills Funding Agency oversight + Funding Audit. The agent provides deterministic Levy expenditure tracking + Apprenticeship Standards progression + EPA outcomes + ESFA reporting with audit-trail. Cross-Reference HMRC PAYE Real Time Information RTI + Apprenticeship Service Account ASA + Digital Apprenticeship Service.
How is US WIOA Joint Performance Indicators plus DOL Office of Apprenticeship reporting handled?
US Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act WIOA 2014 Public Law 113-128 mandates 6 Joint Performance Indicators (employment Q2 post-exit + employment Q4 post-exit + median earnings Q2 post-exit + credential attainment + measurable skill gains + effectiveness in serving employers) per Title I Adult Dislocated Worker Youth + Title II Adult Education + Title III Wagner-Peyser + Title IV Vocational Rehabilitation. US DOL Office of Apprenticeship Registered Apprenticeship 29 CFR 29 + 29 CFR 30 Equal Employment Opportunity in Apprenticeship + RAPIDS Registered Apprenticeship Partners Information Database System + Industry Recognized Apprenticeship Programs IRAP + 26 USC 51 Work Opportunity Tax Credit. The agent provides deterministic WIOA Joint Performance Indicators + Title I-IV reporting + DOL Office of Apprenticeship 29 CFR 29 reporting + RAPIDS submission for State Workforce Investment Boards + American Job Centers + DOL ETA + State Apprenticeship Agencies SAA. Cross-Reference Adult Education and Family Literacy Act AEFLA + Office of Career Technical and Adult Education OCTAE.
How is EU GDPR Article 88 plus works council training codetermination handled?
EU GDPR Article 88 Member State law on processing in the context of employment + Article 6 lawful basis for processing + Article 9 special categories of personal data + Article 22 automated individual decision-making govern training data processing. The agent uses pseudonymisation per Article 4(5) at extraction + aggregation thresholds (typically minimum 5 employees per cohort) prevent re-identification + works council co-determination per EU Information and Consultation Directive 2002/14/EC + national co-determination acts. ML-based transfer indicators are NOT individual decisions per Article 22 - they are dashboard indicators with human validation. DPIA per Article 35 mandatory before deployment. Cross-Reference EDPB Guidelines 1/2024 on HR AI systems + ICO UK guidance on employment monitoring + national supervisory authorities BfDI Germany CNIL France ICO UK AEPD Spain Garante Italy. Works council blockade on aggregate measurement implementation prevents go-live - mandatory consultation + agreement before deployment in EU operations.
How does Phillips ROI Level 5 plus isolation-of-effects work without crossing into high-risk?
Phillips ROI 5-Levels methodology operates on aggregate cohort level - not individual scoring with HR consequences. Level 1 Reaction + Level 2 Learning + Level 3 Behavior + Level 4 Results + Level 5 ROI monetary benefit cost ratio with isolation-of-effects (control group + trend line + forecasting + estimation + management contribution + customer input + expert estimation). The agent provides indicators with confidence scores for L and D Director Dashboards. Decision Layer Type A classification with mandatory human validation L and D Director + business sponsor + CHRO + challengeable auditor pathway prevents drift into automated individual learning consequences. NO automated learning consequences for individuals - hiring + firing + promotion + compensation stay with humans. Cross-Reference EU AI Act Annex III(4) employment management + Article 26 deployer obligations + EDPB Guidelines 1/2024 + EU GDPR Article 22 right not to be subject to automated decision-making + Mobley v. Workday US class action 2023 as precedent AI bias HR-software risk.
What cross-references to other HR agents exist?
Skills-Career-Profile-Agent feeds individual skills assessments into aggregate Training Effectiveness for skill gap analysis. Performance-Review-Documentation-Agent uses Training Effectiveness Level 3 Behavior 90-day post-training observations as evidence in performance reviews. Learning-Path-Recommendation-Agent uses skill gap detection + content recommendations from Training Effectiveness for individual learning paths. Strategic-HR-Analytics-Agent integrates training effectiveness measurements into Board Reporting + ESG/CSRD ESRS S1-13. Workforce-Planning-Agent uses skills framework mappings from Training Effectiveness for headcount planning + scenario modelling. Succession-Planning-Agent uses leadership development effectiveness for board-level talent reviews. Compensation-Benchmarking-Agent integrates skills certification effects into compensation bands. ESG-Reporting-Agent extends ESRS S1-13 training-and-skills-development data to full sustainability reporting. Audit-Compliance-Agent verifies AICPA SOC 2 Type II + EU AI Act Article 26 (when AI features expand).
What Happens Next?
30 minutes
Initial call
We analyse your process and identify the optimal starting point.
1 week
Discover
Mapping your decision logic. Rule sets documented, Decision Layer designed.
3-4 weeks
Build
Production agent in your infrastructure. Governance, audit trail, cert-ready from day 1.
12-18 months
Self-sufficient
Full access to source code, prompts and rule versions. No vendor lock-in.
Implement This Agent?
We assess your process landscape and show how this agent fits into your infrastructure.