Model catalogue · OpenAI
ChatGPT
Vendor: gpt-6-sol, as of 29 September 2026
OpenAI's GPT family is the best-known name of the AI wave and familiar to many staff from private use - the interface and answering style are known quantities, so training time is short. Under professional-secrecy law, everything depends on the route: the contractual chain is closed via Azure and nowhere else. There, the confidentiality undertaking is signed in text form with instruction on criminal liability, and inputs do not flow into model training. Buying directly from the vendor lacks exactly that element - no publicly available document could be found as of the July 2026 research date - and the free consumer access has neither a data processing agreement nor a confidentiality undertaking.
The confidentiality agreement under section 203 of the German Criminal Code is signed. We set the route up without storage at the provider (zero retention) once the provider has committed to it - at Microsoft through the exception from abuse monitoring, which usually takes months. Until then, storage and review by the provider are not ruled out.
The operator bills separately - input EUR 2.1119 · output EUR 10.5597. The figure above is the blend of the two, weighted three quarters input to one quarter output, as it arises in a firm. Charged at the vendor's list price, without a mark-up.
The providers set these prices; they can change at any time, and our figures may contain errors. The list price in force at the time is authoritative.
What it is good for
- Highest recognition inside the firm - ChatGPT is the entry point everyone already knows
- Broad task coverage from drafting work to research preparation
- Contractual line via the vendor's standardised professional-secrecy amendment
Where it stops
- The confidentiality undertaking is signed through our contractual line and covers the Azure models; we set the route up with zero retention once Microsoft grants the exception from abuse monitoring - that usually takes months
- Switching off human abuse review is tied to Microsoft eligibility (a Microsoft account team or an eligible program)
- CLOUD Act exposure remains - the third-country module is mandatory
Status through us
The same model, procured differently, is a different legal position. The status above refers to procurement through us; processing takes place in a third country.
Which route carries it, with which instrument and under which condition, we set out in full to the firm before it commissions us - section 203(4) requires that the chain can be checked, not that it is published. The full matrix, with the sources behind every route, can be requested in the German catalogue after confirming your e-mail address, and we go through it in the conversation.
Is ChatGPT the right fit?
We go through your tasks and the route that carries them - and say plainly where it does not.
Arrange a conversation