Dunning Agent
From overdue invoice to court claim - UK, EU, and US collections law applied deterministically, provisioned under IFRS 9 and CECL, and SOX-auditable.
Turns overdue invoices into court-ready claims, applying UK, EU and US collections law deterministically with IFRS 9 ECL provisioning.
Analyse your processA selection from over 5,000 projects in 25 years of software development
One deterministic collections pipeline across three jurisdictions - UK statutory interest, the EU Late Payment Directive, US FDCPA and Regulation F, and IFRS 9 ECL and ASC 326 CECL provisioning - with no generative AI in any collection or provisioning decision.
The Agent monitors aged receivables across UK, EU, and US debtors, distinguishes B2B from B2C, calculates statutory interest under the UK Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 and EU Directive 2011/7/EU, applies the FDCPA and Regulation F restrictions to US consumer debt, runs the UK Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims with its 30-day Letter of Claim, files with the credit reference agencies (Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, Creditreform, and Dun & Bradstreet), provisions IFRS 9 Expected Credit Loss or ASC 326 CECL pools, monitors limitation periods state-by-state and country-by-country, and routes court action through County Court Money Claim Online in the UK or the US state courts. It is all deterministic, with no generative AI in interest calculation, ECL provisioning, or escalation decisions.
Outcome: DSO reduction of 6-9 days on a typical USD 80M cross-jurisdictional receivables book, automation of 95% of pre-litigation steps, 18-25% reduction in bad-debt write-offs through earlier credit-bureau filing, IFRS 9 / CECL provisioning accuracy that withstands Big-4 substantive testing, and SOX 404 evidence chain pre-assembled for PCAOB inspection.
The 13 deterministic steps are auditable across UK Civil Procedure Rules, EU Late Payment Directive, US FDCPA, IFRS 9 / ASC 326, and SOX 404:
SOX 404 ECL provisioning errors trigger material-weakness disclosure - PCAOB inspections cite AR provisioning as the most common Big-4 audit deficiency
International collections is not one process - it is three regimes operating in parallel with sharply different rules. UK debtors fall under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 (statutory 8% above Bank of England base rate plus fixed compensation per invoice) and the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims (mandatory 30-day Letter of Claim before any court action since 1 October 2017). EU debtors trigger Directive 2011/7/EU with its 30-day default and 60-day maximum B2B payment terms, ECB reference rate plus 8 percentage points statutory interest, and EUR 40 minimum compensation per invoice. US debtors split immediately into commercial (free of FDCPA) versus consumer (where Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and CFPB Regulation F impose hour-of-day restrictions, communication caps, and validation-notice obligations). Layer over this the IFRS 9 Expected Credit Loss model versus US ASC 326 CECL provisioning regime, SOX 404 internal-controls testing for SEC filers, and state-by-state limitation periods in the US, and the result is a pipeline that no single human credit manager can run consistently at scale.
SOX 404 ECL provisioning errors trigger material-weakness disclosure - PCAOB inspections cite AR provisioning as the most common Big-4 audit deficiency
Allowance for doubtful accounts is one of the largest single estimates on the balance sheet of any commercial enterprise - and one of the most subjective. Under IFRS 9 the auditor must test (a) the appropriateness of stage 1 / stage 2 / stage 3 classification, (b) the reasonableness of the 30-day and 90-day rebuttable presumptions, (c) the inputs to 12-month versus lifetime ECL calculation, and (d) the consistency with macroeconomic forecasts. Under US ASC 326 CECL (mandatory for SEC filers from 1 January 2020) the auditor tests the historical loss data, the current conditions overlay, and the reasonable supportable forecast - all of which are management estimates with material judgement.
PCAOB’s 2023 Annual Report inspection findings cite estimate-based allowance accounts among the top-3 most common Big-4 audit deficiencies year after year. A material weakness disclosure under SOX 404 typically erodes 4-7% of share price in the trading week following the 10-K filing - and triggers SEC enforcement scrutiny under SEC Rule 13a-15. For a Russell-3000 mid-cap with USD 800M market cap, a 5% share-price impact equals USD 40M of shareholder value destroyed by an AR provisioning failure that an automated Decision Log would have prevented. Add the audit-fee uplift (Big-4 firms charge a 30-50% premium on remediation engagements), the management distraction (CFO, Controller, and audit-committee time), and the carrying cost in a higher cost of capital, and the practical exposure on a single AR provisioning failure runs to USD 50-100M for a typical mid-cap multinational.
The international collections pipeline runs 13 deterministic steps - not 8
Domestic UK or single-country dunning processes can be modelled in 8 steps. International cross-jurisdictional collections cannot. The Agent splits the pipeline into 13 steps because every escalation decision requires checking the jurisdiction, the debtor classification (B2B versus B2C under three different consumer-protection regimes), the applicable interest rate (UK statutory, EU Directive, or US contractual), the aging-bucket transition (IFRS 9 stage 1 to stage 2 at 30 days past due, stage 3 at 90 days), the credit-bureau filing rules (UK GDPR with ICO guidance, US FCRA, and EU GDPR with national rules), the limitation period (6 years for a simple contract in the UK, 3-15 years state-by-state in the US, and member-state-by-member-state in the EU), and the pre-litigation requirements (the UK Pre-Action Protocol, the US Reg F validation notice, or EU national procedures).
Consider a global mid-cap with USD 800M revenue and USD 80M of average outstanding receivables, split 40% UK, 35% continental EU (Germany, France, Netherlands), and 25% US. On a typical Tuesday batch run the Agent identifies 2,400 invoices overdue by at least one business day, classifies each by jurisdiction and debtor type, calculates 1,800 statutory-interest accruals (under the UK Late Payment Act and the EU Directive separately), checks 380 dunning holds (open disputes, credit notes, and payment plans), sends 920 first reminders, prepares 340 UK Pre-Action Protocol Letters of Claim and 180 US Reg F validation notices, files 520 records with the credit reference agencies (Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, Creditreform, and Dun & Bradstreet), provisions 280 receivables to IFRS 9 stage 2 and 95 to stage 3, updates 45 ASC 326 CECL pools for the US-listed parent’s SEC filing, flags 22 receivables approaching limitation (at the 5y9m mark on the UK 6-year horizon, for early action), prepares 8 statutory demands under the Insolvency Act 1986 for UK corporate debtors over GBP 750, and routes 3 cases to Treasury and Legal for a human decision on MCOL filing versus solicitor escalation.
In the Decision Layer, 12 of the 13 steps are rule-based (R). The single human decision is the formal escalation - whether to file a UK Statutory Demand under Insolvency Act 1986 s. 123, route to MCOL or High Court, or pursue US state court action. That decision involves trade-offs between recovery probability, customer relationship, court fees (UK MCOL: GBP 35-10,000 sliding scale, US small claims USD 25-200), legal costs, and reputational risk that no rule should resolve unilaterally. Every other step - interest calculation, validation notice, credit-bureau filing, ECL provisioning, limitation tracking - is a deterministic application of statute, regulation, or accounting standard.
Reconciliation before any escalation step prevents wrongful collection - and Reg F violations
Automated dunning without real-time payment reconciliation is a Regulation F violation waiting to happen. Reg F Sec. 1006.30 prohibits misleading representations including any communication that misrepresents the amount or status of a debt. A consumer pays via Faster Payments at 5pm Friday, the Agent sends a dunning notice at 7am Monday before the bank-statement reconciliation has run - the consumer immediately has a CFPB complaint pathway with statutory damages USD 100-1,000 per violation under FDCPA Sec. 1692k. UK equivalent: ICO can find a UK GDPR Art. 5(1)(d) accuracy violation. EU equivalent: national consumer protection authorities can act under Directive 2011/83/EU.
The Agent therefore runs reconciliation as the 13th decision-point gate before any new dunning step. Bank-statement formats are pulled in real time: SEPA and CAMT.053 for the EU, BACS, Faster Payments, and CHAPS notifications for the UK, and NACHA ACH and FedWire for the US. Open Banking PSD3 (EU implementation date pending) and PSD2 (still in force in the UK post-Brexit) provide payment-initiation and account-information services with a full consent trail. FDX (Financial Data Exchange) standardises US Open Banking. Partial payments are recognised with proportional allocation across principal, interest, and fixed compensation per the contractual or statutory order of imputation (UK common-law rule in Clayton’s Case 1816 for current accounts, otherwise contract-driven). Only receivables genuinely outstanding after reconciliation continue through the escalation pipeline.
Limitation periods, statutory demands, and cross-border enforcement need precision without margin
Limitation is jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction. UK: simple contract debt 6 years from accrual under Limitation Act 1980 s. 5, specialty debt 12 years under s. 8. US: state-by-state - New York 6 years (CPLR 213), California 4 years (CCP 337), Texas 4 years (Tex. Civ. Prac. and Rem. Code 16.004) for written contracts. EU: Germany 3 years (BGB Sec. 195/199), France 5 years (Code civil Art. 2224), Spain 5 years (Codigo Civil Art. 1964 amended 2015), Italy 10 years (Codice civile Art. 2946). Restart triggers vary - acknowledgement in writing, part-payment, court action, or arbitration notice can each restart the clock under different rules.
The Agent monitors limitation daily and flags receivables approaching 90 days from limitation expiry, recommending interruption tactics: a UK Statutory Demand under Insolvency Act 1986 s. 123 (corporate debtor over GBP 750, individual over GBP 5,000, 21-day expiry triggers winding-up petition presumption), a US written acknowledgement request, or an EU member-state-specific extrajudicial interruption (e.g., German requirement of either acknowledgement or court action under BGB Sec. 212-213). For genuinely cross-border claims, the Agent prepares the European Account Preservation Order (EAPO) packet under EU Regulation 655/2014 - a unilateral pre-judgment freeze on debtor accounts in another EU member state. Brussels Regulation Recast (Regulation 1215/2012) provides recognition and enforcement of judgments across EU members; the UK exited this regime post-Brexit, so UK-EU cross-border enforcement now relies on the Hague 2005 Choice of Court Convention or bilateral treaties.
Integration ecosystem: SAP, Oracle, Workday, Sage Intacct, plus credit bureaus and court systems
The Agent integrates natively with the major international ERPs: SAP S/4HANA Cloud FI-AR and Credit Management via OData, Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials Receivables and Advanced Collections via REST, Workday Financial Management Customer Accounts via WSDL/SOAP, Sage Intacct Collections Automation via REST, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance Credit and Collections via OData, and Oracle NetSuite SuiteCloud Receivables Management. For specialist AR automation it integrates with BlackLine Cash Application and Collections (Big-4 audit-friendly with PCAOB-aligned controls) and HighRadius Collections Cloud (IFRS 9 and CECL ready). The credit-bureau APIs cover Experian Business and Consumer, Equifax Commercial and Consumer, and TransUnion across the UK and US, the Creditreform Verband API for Germany and Central Europe, CRIF for Italy and Central Europe, and Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S Direct and DataBlocks. UK court integration runs through County Court Money Claim Online for claims up to GBP 100,000, with electronic filing and fee payment by debit card; US court integration varies state by state, typically through state-court e-filing systems or third-party filers such as One Legal and File & ServeXpress. Outbound dunning communications honour the Reg F time restrictions (8 a.m. to 9 p.m. local debtor time, with a 7-in-7 communication cap), the UK Pre-Action Protocol templates, and EU member-state-specific notice requirements - all generated as deterministic templates with audit-trail metadata for SOX 404 evidence packs and PCAOB substantive testing.
Micro-Decision Table
Who decides in this agent?
13 decision steps, split by decider
Identify overdue invoice Which invoice has passed its contractual due date by at least 1 business day? Rules Engine Vendor
Open-item ledger query against AR aging; EU Directive 2011/7/EU Art. 3 (30-day default, 60-day max B2B unless objectively justified); UK Late Payment Act 1998 s. 4 (default 30 days from delivery or invoice receipt, whichever later)
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Classify aging bucket for ECL provisioning Bucket 0-30 / 31-60 / 61-90 / 91-180 / 180+ days for IFRS 9 stage 1/2/3 or CECL pool? Rules Engine Auditor
IFRS 9 Para 5.5 (12-month vs lifetime ECL transition at significant increase in credit risk); ASC 326-20 (CECL pooled estimation for SEC filers from 2020); EBA Guidelines GL/2017/06 on credit institutions ECL practices
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Auditor
Check dunning hold flags Open dispute, pending credit note, payment plan, or contractual hold in place? Rules Engine Vendor
Master-data hold flags and the dispute ledger. FCA CONC 7 requires UK regulated firms to suspend collections during a dispute, and Reg F Sec. 1006.34 bars collection during the initial 14-day US validation period.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Distinguish jurisdiction of debtor Debtor incorporated in UK / EU member state / US / third country? Rules Engine Vendor
Determines the applicable interest rate (8% above the BoE base in the UK, 8 percentage points above the ECB reference rate in the EU, and the contractual rate or state usury cap in the US), the enforcement route (MCOL, EAPO, or US state court), and whether the consumer or commercial regime applies.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Distinguish B2B vs B2C debtor Commercial debtor (UK Late Payment Act / EU Directive 2011/7/EU) or consumer (UK Consumer Rights Act 2015 / US FDCPA / EU Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU)? Rules Engine Vendor
FDCPA 15 U.S.C. 1692a(5) defines consumer debt narrowly (personal, family, or household); EU Directive 2011/7/EU explicitly excludes B2C. The consumer regime triggers the FDCPA validation notice and Reg F restrictions, while the commercial regime allows statutory interest and compensation.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Calculate statutory interest and compensation Which statutory rate applies - the UK Bank of England base rate plus 8% with the fixed sum under the Late Payment Act 1998, the EU ECB reference rate plus 8 points with EUR 40 minimum compensation, or the US contractual rate within the state usury cap? Rules Engine Vendor
Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 s. 5-5A; EU Directive 2011/7/EU Art. 3, 6; US state-by-state usury law (e.g., New York 16% civil, 25% criminal usury cap); contractual interest rate prevails where higher and not unconscionable
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Send first dunning notice (gentle reminder) Issue first reminder by email, letter, or portal notification? Rules Engine Vendor
Reg F Sec. 1006.6 in the US prohibits an inconvenient time or place and requires meaningful disclosure; UK Pre-Action Protocol Para 3 calls for proportionate communications; and EU Directive 2011/7/EU does not prescribe a form but recital 12 expects a reasonable demand.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Send Pre-Action Protocol Letter of Claim (UK) or equivalent After 30+ days overdue, issue UK Pre-Action Protocol Letter of Claim with 30-day reply window (or US Reg F validation notice with 30-day dispute right)? Rules Engine Vendor
UK Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims Para 3.1 (mandatory before issuing court claim, breach risks costs sanctions per CPR 44.4); US Reg F Sec. 1006.34(c) requires validation notice with itemization, debt details, and consumer rights within 5 days of initial communication
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Report to credit reference agencies After 60+ days overdue, file with Experian / Equifax / TransUnion / Creditreform / D and B? Rules Engine Vendor
UK GDPR Art. 6(1)(f) legitimate interest and ICO guidance on credit reporting; the US Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681) for accuracy and dispute rights; and EU GDPR Art. 6(1)(f) together with national credit-reporting laws such as the German Bundesdatenschutzgesetz Sec. 31.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Calculate IFRS 9 ECL or ASC 326 CECL provision Apply 12-month ECL (stage 1) or lifetime ECL (stage 2/3) under IFRS 9, or pooled CECL estimate under ASC 326? Rules Engine Auditor
Under IFRS 9 Para 5.5.5 and B5.5.17 a significant increase in credit risk triggers stage 2, and under ASC 326-20-30 the CECL day-one provision is based on historical loss, current conditions, and a reasonable forecast. An audit trail is required under SOX 404 and PCAOB AS 2110.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Auditor
Check limitation / statute of limitations UK: simple contract debt 6 years (Limitation Act 1980 s. 5), specialty debt 12 years; US: state-by-state 3-15 years; EU: varies (DE 3 years BGB Sec. 195, FR 5 years C. civ. art. 2224, ES 5 years)? Rules Engine Auditor
Limitation Act 1980 (UK); US state limitation statutes (e.g., NY CPLR 213 - 6 years contract; CA CCP 337 - 4 years); BGB Sec. 195/199 (DE); restart triggers vary (acknowledgement, part-payment, court action)
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Auditor
Escalate to formal demand or court action UK debt over GBP 750 corporate / GBP 5,000 individual: file Statutory Demand under Insolvency Act 1986 s. 123 then MCOL (claims up to GBP 100,000) or High Court (over GBP 100,000)? US: pre-litigation demand letter then small claims (state thresholds USD 5,000-25,000) or state civil court? Human
Strategic decision considering recovery prospects, customer relationship, court fees (UK MCOL: GBP 35-10,000 sliding scale; US small claims USD 25-200), legal costs, and reputational risk - decided by Treasury / Legal counsel; Insolvency Act 1986 s. 123(1)(a) provides 21-day demand triggering winding-up petition presumption
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - via manager, works council, or formal objection process.
Reconcile interim payment Has partial or full payment landed via SEPA / Faster Payments / ACH / SWIFT since the last dunning step? Rules Engine Vendor
Real-time bank-statement reconciliation against open AR over PSD2/PSD3 Open Banking, UK Faster Payments, and US ACH NACHA, run before any escalation step to prevent wrongful collection under the Reg F Sec. 1006.30 prohibition on misleading representations.
Decision Record
Challengeable: Yes - rule application verifiable. Objection possible for incorrect data or wrong rule version.
Challengeable by: Vendor
Decision Record and Right to Challenge
Every decision this agent makes or prepares is documented in a complete decision record. Affected parties (employees, suppliers, auditors) can review, understand, and challenge every individual decision.
Does this agent fit your process?
We analyse your specific finance process and show how this agent fits into your system landscape. 30 minutes, no preparation needed.
Analyse your processGovernance Notes
Of the 13 steps, 12 are rule-based (R) and one is human (the court-action escalation). Under the EU AI Act the Agent is not high-risk, since financial collections without a person-affecting creditworthiness decision fall outside the Annex III enumeration. Under SOX 404, AR ECL provisioning is a key control, and the Agent's Decision Log provides PCAOB-testable evidence; Big-4 auditors increasingly cite AR provisioning as the most common material-weakness finding in the PCAOB 2023 Annual Report inspection findings.
For combined UK, EU, and US operations the Agent applies the most stringent retention rule globally - by default 10 years under EU VAT Directive Art. 246 - to dunning correspondence. Debtor personal data such as name, address, payment behaviour, and dispute history is processed under UK GDPR Art. 6(1)(f) legitimate interest with ICO credit-reporting guidance, EU GDPR Art. 6(1)(f) with national credit-reporting laws, and the US FCRA with state laws such as the California CCPA and the NY SHIELD Act. FDCPA Sec. 1692c restrictions apply only to consumer debt, never to B2B commercial collections, and Regulation F (CFPB 2021) overlays the FDCPA with explicit time-and-place restrictions (8 a.m. to 9 p.m. local debtor time) and a 7-in-7 communication cap.
Assessment
Prerequisites
- ERP with AR aging report: SAP S/4HANA Cloud, Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials, Workday Financial Management, Sage Intacct, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, NetSuite, or specialist BlackLine / HighRadius
- API connections to the credit reference agencies: Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion (UK and US, consumer and commercial), Creditreform (Germany and Central Europe), CRIF (Italy and Central Europe), and Dun & Bradstreet (international)
- Open Banking PSD3 (EU) / PSD2 (UK) / FDX (US) / NACHA (US ACH) connectivity for real-time payment reconciliation
- UK County Court Money Claim Online (MCOL) account or solicitor for claims over GBP 100,000
- WORM-compliant archive (Amazon S3 Object Lock, Azure Blob Immutable Storage) for IRS Sec. 1.6001-1 (US 7-year), HMRC Notice 700/21 (UK 6-year), EU VAT 10-year retention of dunning correspondence
- SOX 404 controls matrix with documented segregation-of-duties between collections, treasury, and legal functions
Infrastructure Contribution
The Dunning Agent is the central node of the international AR pipeline. It feeds the Cash Application Agent with bank-statement reconciliation across MT940, CAMT.053, BAI2, and NACHA returns, the Receivables Management Agent with a credit-limit recalibration after each escalation, and the SOX-Compliance Agent with PCAOB-testable controls evidence. It consumes from the Invoice Generation Agent (open AR and due dates), the Vendor and Customer Master Data Agent (jurisdiction and B2B/B2C classification), and the credit reference agencies (creditworthiness scoring). It also cross-feeds the IFRS 9 ECL Provisioning Agent with the 12-month-versus-lifetime ECL transition triggers and the ASC 326 CECL Pool Agent for US SEC filers.
For each overdue receivable the Agent records the original invoice number, issue date, due date, currency, and amount; the jurisdiction (UK, EU member state, US state, or third country); the debtor classification (B2B under the Late Payment Act or Directive 2011/7/EU, or B2C under the FDCPA, the Consumer Rights Act, or Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU); the aging bucket; the dunning hold flags and their reasons; the statutory-interest calculation, including the rate, base date, base-rate source, and accrued amount; and the fixed-compensation amounts (GBP 40, 70, or 100 in the UK, EUR 40 in the EU). It logs every dunning communication with its channel, timestamp, and content hash, the Pre-Action Protocol Letter of Claim in the UK or the Reg F validation notice in the US, the credit-bureau filings and reference numbers, the IFRS 9 ECL stage assignment and provision amount, the ASC 326 CECL pool and provision for US SEC filers, the limitation-period status, any statutory demand under the UK Insolvency Act 1986 or US pre-suit demand, and the court filing details (the MCOL claim number or US court docket). Human escalation decisions are documented with Treasury or Legal sign-off and a rationale. The audit trail supports PCAOB AS 2110 substantive testing, HMRC enquiries, EU Commission Late Payment Directive monitoring, and CFPB Reg F examinations.
What this assessment contains: 9 slides for your leadership team
Personalised with your numbers. Generated in 2 minutes directly in your browser. No upload, no login.
- 1
Title slide - Process name, decision points, automation potential
- 2
Executive summary - FTE freed, cost per transaction before/after, break-even date, cost of waiting
- 3
Current state - Transaction volume, error costs, growth scenario with FTE comparison
- 4
Solution architecture - Human - rules engine - AI agent with specific decision points
- 5
Governance - EU AI Act, GoBD/statutory, audit trail - with traffic light status
- 6
Risk analysis - 5 risks with likelihood, impact and mitigation
- 7
Roadmap - 3-phase plan with concrete calendar dates and Go/No-Go
- 8
Business case - 3-scenario comparison (do nothing/hire/automate) plus 3×3 sensitivity matrix
- 9
Discussion proposal - Concrete next steps with timeline and responsibilities
Includes: 3-scenario comparison
Do nothing vs. new hire vs. automation - with your salary level, your error rate and your growth plan. The one slide your CFO wants to see first.
Show calculation methodology
Hourly rate: Annual salary (your input) × 1.3 employer burden ÷ 1,720 annual work hours
Savings: Transactions × 12 × automation rate × minutes/transaction × hourly rate × economic factor
Quality ROI: Error reduction × transactions × 12 × EUR 260/error (APQC Open Standards Benchmarking)
FTE: Saved hours ÷ 1,720 annual work hours
Break-Even: Benchmark investment ÷ monthly combined savings (efficiency + quality)
New hire: Annual salary × 1.3 + EUR 12,000 recruiting per FTE
All data stays in your browser. Nothing is transmitted to any server.
Dunning Agent
Initial assessment for your leadership team
A thorough initial assessment in 2 minutes - with your numbers, your risk profile and industry benchmarks. No vendor logo, no sales pitch.
All data stays in your browser. Nothing is transmitted.
Related Pages
Related Agents
Cash Application Agent
Read incoming payments, assign to debtors, clear invoices - automatically reconciled.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the Agent handle the UK Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims - and what happens if we skip it?
MCOL vs County Court Business Centre vs High Court - when does the Agent route which way?
Does the FDCPA apply to our B2B collections in the US?
EU Directive 2011/7/EU - 30 days default vs 60 days max - how does this differ from UK Late Payment Act?
IFRS 9 Expected Credit Loss vs ASC 326 CECL - how does the Agent provision differently?
When does the Agent file with credit reference agencies - and what UK GDPR / US FCRA exposure does this create?
What does SOX 404 require for AR provisioning - and why is this a PCAOB inspection focus?
What Happens Next?
30 minutes
Initial call
We analyse your process and identify the optimal starting point.
1 week
Discover
Mapping your decision logic. Rule sets documented, Decision Layer designed.
3-4 weeks
Build
Production agent in your infrastructure. Governance, audit trail, cert-ready from day 1.
12-18 months
Self-sufficient
Full access to source code, prompts and rule versions. No vendor lock-in.
Implement This Agent?
We assess your finance process landscape and show how this agent fits your infrastructure.